keroncoward said:
Soma said:
Number of punches landed is just half of the picture, it's more important who did more damage. Pacquiao connected more punches in the third fight, but Marquez the harder punches and that's why almost all people consider it was a robbery. In the first two fights Marquez outlanded Pacquiao, does that mean he deserved to win those fights? (Although I think he did, but not because of that but because he looked better imo)
|
My god you guys are crazy lol The third fight was a clear robbery. If you dont consider it a robbery then Bardley won his fight. Be real and be fair Pacquiao was not connecting most of his shots in the third fight he was getting countered and isolated with footwork all night. As a matter of fact Marquez did a lot better than when they fought and had a draw so how the hell did he lose? It was clearly a robbery just as much as the Bradley win.
|
LOL! this guy again and his full of shit analysis.. HAHAHA .. lol
I take back what I said about shuting up... dont stop posting in this thread here.. and continue to enlighten us with your superior boxing knowledge pro! =D
