By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
theprof00 said:
Kowen what are you talking about, what's the lie?
Seriously love people that just say things as if they're fact. Probably some of the best users on this site.

Its tantamount to lies.  You are picking facts to suit your argument and hoping nobody notices. 

The only facts that matter are the sales of both over a period compared side by side and over the same time frames.

The 3DS was always tracking ahead of the Vita, whatever the price point.

The reaction Sony had with the PS3 price points proves that this isnt "outlasting", it's Hobsons Choice for Sony up until now.

1. A metric that you propose that goes against the metric I'm using. You call my metric misleading. I say your metric is for another thread. This is specifically from one point of view in which Vita was able to sell past a certain number of consoles before a price drop. This is also not to imply that Nintendo could not, but rather that the Vita is still capable of selling consoles at a pretty good clip. Your problem with this thread is that you want to judge things based on a metric that is 'off-topic'.

2. I've never said it wasn't, nor implied that Vita would outsell it on the same timeframe. I've made it readily apparent that Nintendo was selling still much better pre-price cut. Again, you are looking at the OP from a single perspective.

3. That's not countering anything I've said. I've readily admitted that Sony would love to drop the price.

 

Where are the lies Kowen? More baseless accusations? More baiting and flaming?