Elementary School Shooting Leaves 27 Dead(20 children)(Shooter son of teacher)

[killerzX]

Cirio said:

killerzX said:

 

. Also, if the 11 thousand death toll from firearms can be reduced via greater restrictions, then what's the problem with it? In the case of this shooting, NO ONE needs 4 firearms. That in itself is a problem, and a major one as it has been evidenced after today's incident.

no one needs a big house. no one needs a fast car. no one needs a lot of money. who are you to say no one needs four firearms. i have 5. and i need them all. My Glock 19, to carry around for protection. My Ruger 10-22 for cheap plinking. My Ak-47 for fun and hunting. My scar 17 for big game hunting, and my shotgun for trap and skeet. having 4 firearms or 1 doesnt making someone a killer or any more deadly. you can only use one at once. and the guy used a pistol. not even his big scar black high powered assualt  rifle, with high capicity clip, and cop killing rounds.

Also, in response to that stupid comment about baseball bats in this graph, would 20 children today have died if that guy had a baseball bat? Hell, even a knife? The answer is obviously no. Firearm homicide after these 4 incidents has become a significant problem, there's no way one can spin it.

the same day 22 or so people in a chinese school were attacked with a knife. and just a few day before that another man in china killed 9 and injured 4 others in a knife attack. i see no reason why the guy couldnt have killed dozens of small defenseless children with a knife of some sort. really kindergardeners wouldnt be hard to kill, especially with no one there to defend them. (firearms) Homocides have been droping every year. we a at 40 year lows in crime. these murder sprees are almost exclusively happening in "gun free zones" i dont think for a second that its a coincidence. its been proven over and over again, that places in the US with stricter gun control have higher or increased crime rates, and places where the relax the gun law crime drops.