By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
happydolphin said:
theprof00 said:
I think the difference between myself and dissenters, is that I'm of a realistic understanding of what success constitutes. For example, I'm pretty sure some of the bigger posters on here have called psp a failure, and while vita hasn't exactly done psp numbers, there's plenty of time to improve.

Again, I will ask, would there be a thread if Sony had cut the price. Let's pretend Sony did have enough money to cut it safely, let's pretend these excuse variables didn't exist. Would there have been a thread if Vita had dropped in price previously to selling what 3ds did. Yes. Yes there would.

Even later in its life, even if it becomes more successful than the psp, I imagine there will be all kinds of excuses to continue trolling it.

No, you're not, because ITT you mention that the Vita outlasted the 3DS, insinuating that the Vita surpassed the 3DS in a certain benchmark which, once properly analyzed, actually emphasises Sony's inability to reach the expectations they had originally set. Why? It could be due to not having the ability to change strategies, it could be because they hope to reach it at a later date.

All in all this thread goes to show how misled a person can truly be when the value-system is skewed.

All I insinuated is that the Vita managed to keep up sales to past a point where Nintendo deemed it appropriate. I didn't insinuate that any console is better than another. Yours is a strawman argument..you are arguing a point I have not made, but insist on telling me what my own point is based on conjecture and hidden messages.

Wake up.