Nirvana_Nut85 on 14 December 2012
JoeTheBro said: Your problem is that you're arguing for science as a way to argue against religion. Even if you succeed in "proving" science, you've done nothing against religion. |
I have to say that your comment is probably the most intelligent thing I have heard used to explain to someone why using science to argue against religion is moot, or vice versa.
" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"