Kasz216 said:
becaues it required a bundle...? I'll try one more time though within an exagerrated example... using a different platform and company. Just in case that helps for you.
Say next year the next COD game comes to the Wii U.... and it sells as much as the 360 version... because Nintendo bundled it with Wii U's and also offered any nintendo published game 75% off if you bought it stand alone. Would it then make sense to Activision to say "Wow what a great success!" and then release another similar big franchise game, but with less name brand appeal, with no similar deal? Or would it make more sense to say "Good that was a success" and then be more pragmatic because the success was in large part fueled by the special deal made. |
Do you think Ubisoft made a bundle deal with Sony without them estimating how it will preform. When Ubisoft said that they where satisfied will the games sales then the game met the companies expectation. I wont deny most of the sales are from bundles, but If Ubisoft is satisifed with them bundles then they can decare it a success.
Success here for Ubisoft is that the game made them profit. Wouldn't it make sense for them to invest more in the system that made them profits.
Bet with gooch_destroyer, he wins if FFX and FFX-2 will be at $40 each for the vita. I win if it dont
Sign up if you want to see God Eater 2 get localized!! https://www.change.org/petitions/shift-inc-bring-god-eater-2-to-north-america-2#share








