How to Destroy an Athiests in a argument! (Updated with poll)

[weaveworld]

Kasz216 said:

KungKras said:

irstupid said:

Alara317 said:

HesAPooka said:
I'm not religious, but I also don't go around bashing people who are.

Criticizing religion is "There's no substantial proof in god or the spiritual.  Until you can prove it, I can't take your claims as anything more than empty claims." 

That's the most pathetic argument ever invented.

It has the exact same counter argument.  "Prove that God doesn't exist"

That's the most pathetic counter argument ever. The one making the claim has to prove it. Otherwise, if you can't disprove flying space unicorns in the andromeda galaxy, it's a totally valid theory.

I feel like it's worth noting that if we are talking historical proof, as in, enough proof that something existed in the past... there actually as much proof for God as there is most commonly taught historical figures.

Just something interesting to consider the next time you think of a historical figure like Nero, or Julius Ceaser a number of Egyptian Pharohs etc.

 Or even more interestingly, third party figures.

Despite dig-sites and a lot of Roman cities still around, pictures of Caeser on coins and bustes of the same head, drawings, sadly enough copies of his manuscripts, mentions in historians work (Sallust 86-34BC) that did survive, you are saying that there is as much historical evidence of his existence as of gods existence?