TruckOSaurus said:
pokoko said: For me it's the original Mario games. My friends used to race over how fast they could beat the first one. I, however, did not care. At all. I owned three Mario games on the NES and SNES and didn't get over halfway in any of them. I didn't like the character, I didn't like the (lack of a) story, I didn't like hitting blocks over and over, the coins, any of it. There were so many better games on the NES. Give me Mega Man any day of the week. I will always believe that the Mario phenomenon is entirely due to the game being included with the system. I have nothing against Nintendo, but I look forward to the day when Mario is in decline so people can discover something different. |
How do NES Mega Man games offer a better story than Super Mario? Dr. Willy make 8 robots, kill them all then kick Willy's ass, that's just as bare bones as "Rescue the princess".
|
That's not exactly true, as Mega Man did have a better story than Mario, as far as I know. Still, I said that I think Mega Man is a better game, not that it has a better story, and that's mostly because, in my opinion, the game-play goes beyond just jumping on things. You had to use a bit of intelligence and the way the worlds were structured gave you options. Personally, I enjoyed Mega Man a LOT more than Mario.