| Kasz216 said: Eh, they'll default, and they'll replace those school districts with new ones... the lawyers will have a hell of a time repossessing anything of value, since I think the buildings would still belong to the state. Not the school district. (I could be wrong on this.)
They'll probably go with the first option too, because I don't think you can legally tie the state or county to something the school board decided. If it wasn't California i'd say the state would probably use it to union bust, but it is, so that probably won't happen. They MAY force the teachers to be rehired and take a paycut. Though even then the teacher union probably won't go for it. So it'll probably just be all the same, but different name. Different school board. |
That does make the most sence. I currently live in California, and it amazes me how bad our state government has been, and we keep re electing the same people over and over. The business climate is horrible, a lot of regulation for everything, and a lot of corruption in local city and county governement.
@richard
California is currently being completly run by democrats, and before that is was always majority democrat so i do not see how the republicans or conservatives are the issue. If anything it is the over regulation and over taxation of residents and businesses that are casuing problems for the state. There is a very well off region that passes regultions that all of CA have to follow that don't neccissarily benefit all Californians.
