| SWORDF1SH said:
It's a random joke. I can see for some reason youre offended by the Iwata reference. That reference to him was for the mix up between the R&D staff and Iwata request for peripherals. They produced profiteroles because they sound similar, nothing more complicated than that. Iwata ran off like a mad man because maybe he's gone mad over the situation. I didn't mention that because I left it to the reader to draw that line. This is what started off the joke which lead to the creamium, creamium premium with extra chocolate, super profiterole land, whip up an excitement and keeping controller in fridge to keep fresh references. It's as simple as that.I ended it with the Iwata part to explain how the profiterole WiiU came to be and wrap it up. Maybe I wasn't in peoples face enough. Random humour FTW. As for the critism yeah maybe people don't like it, I can happily take that but what I won't take is you criticising my site because of a forum post and posting childish replies and acting juvenile. I had another kid saying I was a fanboy in another thread because of this thread. Maybe people feel like I'm taking a pop at Ninty or maybe few good replies have been added because it's been tainted by bad replies. People feel more compelled to be negative than positive. Also If you want to give critism seriously, don't do it in a condescending manner. But yes IF I make a joke about someone's character someday I will MAYBE use your advice on how to correctly make fun of someone. Thanx |
You're taking massive offense to the criticism once again. Why don't you re-read my siilar example and see that perhaps I was showing you from a different view WHY the "joke" made no sense, that it was just a conglomerate of random stupidity and nonsense. And yes, the site was brought up as a highlight that, while you're posting absolute garbage here, at the same time you're trying to promote a site, which is actuallly becoming detrimental to your intentions of advertising it in a positive light. It's the same as acting like an absolute ass at the pub while still wearing your employee nametag, and then getting fired from your job because of it. You had 2 options, to take the criticism constructively and realise that this is only damaging your site's rep, or backlash at the criticism. You unfortunately chose the latter, which has only progressed the damage.
There's a difference between being offended by a part and using one particular part for reference. That's what you're remaining compltely oblivious about. In truth, the whole thing was dog turd, but I can also ask, since this is merely taking a homophone too far, is substituting "premium" for "creamium" supposed to be the funny part? Was there some previous reference to make the bridge, or was using a homophone the entire joke? The rest of the thing appears to be just taking this original part further and further, so if the original homophone didn't have a reason, then the whole thing collapses.
Random humor is only FTW if it's done properly. I'm suprised that somebody who grew up in the UK, with an absolute plethora of some of the best comedy shows in history all over the BBC during the 70s and 80s that this creamium thing could still even be considered close to humor.
If your answer to all of this criticism is "people are more compelled to be negative than positive", then that's just pure ignorance, and I'm sorry you seem to haven't learned a thing about constructive criticism. How would I know? Because now you're attempting to criticise my criticism! Wonderful! Keep this in mind, however; my criticism MAY have been condescending, but it worked. In fact, I appear to be the only critic that you've replied to in this entire thread.
Oh and if you ask for my advice, I wouldn't give it to you. Why? Because unlike you, I'm not attemting to pass myself off as some kind of comedic creator. That's the difference here.
