RoryGamesFree said:
no, it highlights and enhances the mistakes of the league of nations by making the UN even more of a bad joke and even more obviously biased. it allows the bullying cunts of the world to continue being so is what it does, it means that 90% of the world can decide something is wrong and then have one of the cuntnations say "nah, HAHAHAHAHA vetoed" whenever it suits them or their "friends". it's about as balanced as having a football match where one team has all it's players injured and has to field a bunch of people who don't know the rules playing against a team that has all the best players and also bribed the referee. the key to peace is democracy and equality, the veto makes both impossible and your beloved balance is non existent as a result. |
Let's say that 90% was against Russia, or America, or any one of the major powers. If they feel isolated and feel like the rest of the world is determined to railroad their interests into a corner and is out to get them; they'll go to war.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







