By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Veknoid_Outcast said:
runqvist said:
DieAppleDie said:
runqvist said:
oniyide said:
N64 its almost not fair, Xbox had good games but alot of them were multiplat, it had just a few to call its own, while N64 did have a handful of exclusives

When you compare 2 consoles, it is the library what matters. Not just the exclusives.

well the fact that you can get those same games anywherelse makes the value of the console fall

Ok. Can I play those games I listed on N64? You know, the second console of this comparison?

Come on. If you want to use that logic, then N64 has StarCraft, Quake, and Sim City 2000.

If you need to pad your list with ports, multiplatform games, and titles like Kill.Switch then you have a losing argument.

Oh, by the way, those "couple of zeldas, mario games and james bond shooter" are universally adored, and consistently rank among the very best video games ever made.

The Xbox was a good console, with some great titles. It just doesn't compare favorably to N64. There's no shame in that.


If N64 had those games, then it had them. Is it that hard to understand?

Those games are part of xbox library, which is far superior to N64:s pitiful library. Of course everyone has different opinions and it is fine if you prefer to have those couple of mario/zelda/whatnot games compared to what xbox had.

And that list was just the xbox games I own. I know all of them aren't great and there are definitely some gems missing.