killerzX on 04 December 2012
| badgenome said: On second thought, I'm afraid the present interpretation of "the press" is too broad. The only sort of speech that should be protected is that which comes from an actual printing press. Since the founding fathers couldn't have imagined something like the internet because they lived a long time ago (like 50 years ago!) the government should be able to do whatever it wants in that area. Roll on, SOPA! |
or microphones... there's no way the founding fathers could have envisioned the press having microphones. There should be background checks on these microphones and a waiting period to see if you are mature enough to use it. and take a test too before you are allowed one.
After all if it werent for microphones buffoons in the media like bob costas coldnt have said their idiotic statements.
