dsgrue3 on 04 December 2012
| J_Allard said: Is it really that hard for you to understand? We "should be able to see" what's you're conveying to us? Maybe you're just wrong? You do understand the concept of opinion, yes? Because that's all you're conveying here, is an opinion. Same as we are. And like any opinion, one can agree or disagree. |
I do understand. You believe Live is a superior service to PSN, but you aren't addressing the MS model of restricting half your game's content. Live does not create online multiplayer for your games, nor is it doing anything special to limit latency. This is all decided upon by the game devs.
Do you think that one TV maker charging a monthly/yearly fee to use its online aspect is fair? Do you think one PC maker charging to play your games online is fair? This is exactly as MS is doing. If you do think it is fair, I can't understand, but I will stop this discussion and we can agree to disagree.
