thranx on 04 December 2012
| dsgrue3 said: Both of you are completely incapable of realizing the situation. You are basically being charged for subscription-based multiplayer, only that subscription should be going to the game developers as they are the ones who create the multiplayer aspect of the game and support it. Not Microsoft, yet MS is reaping the rewards. Why do you think COD attempted to institute that subscription pro nonsense? I understand you feel as though the package is worth it, that isn't an issue. The issue is the lockout of content that has nothing to do with MS by MS. What if you had to start paying your Computer maker for online gaming? What if you had to pay your Television maker to use the internet on internet capable TVs? How you can say this model isn't extortion is really beyond belief. Maybe I am just poorly explaining it, but you should be able to see what I am attempting to convey to you. This isn't an attack on Xbox360 owners who pay for Live, it's an attack on Microsoft for extortion. |
its not extorition becuase there is a clear choice. the facts are known before the system is bought, not after. Its really that simple.
Extortion happens when people have no choice, like in a disaster someone racking up the price of needed goods. a $15 bag of bread is only extorion when it happens after a disaster, after choices have been taken away through a natural disaster.
with xbox live they have a choice to not buy the system and instead get one that has free online. there is no way you can twist xbox live into being extortion. if it was they would be breaking the law as extrotion is illegal. so the governments of the world do not agree with you either.
