S.T.A.G.E. said:
J_Allard said:
That's funny, Sony put a high price on the PS3 and made it look nice and the result was 3rd place.
|
SMH. Again, they go off topic to argue for the sake of arguing. This is when you see that this is psychological. Sony never sold an image to people, but thats another story. Sony did not become a true commercially grand marketing image until 2009 with the "It Only Does Everything" campaigns and the redesigns of the PS3. Second of all, Sony knew they were going to take a hit on the PS3, but they also knew people would buy it. Blu Ray is the new booming image of disc based multimedia and I doubt even Microsoft at this point can hold back from getting Blu Ray now as much as they fought and preached against it. Its shown its value in home movies and its amazing amount of content that can be put on it. I will no longer respond to this argument after this, its off topic.
|
What.. so Sony released a $600 console with no image to sell it? They simply depended on the good heart of the buying public to give them a chance?
Sony has had an image for decades in electronics and since the mid 90's in gaming in general. And don't try to tell me Sony did not try to create an image with the PS3. You're correct when you say Live has an image. EVERY PRODUCT DOES. That's what good companies do. It's hilarious watching you move the goal posts around for MS with some of these posts all so you can make a pedestal to put Sony on though.
