r3tr0gam3r1337 said:
AndrewWK said:
r3tr0gam3r1337 said:
AndrewWK said:
r3tr0gam3r1337 said:
AndrewWK said:
Well if you want your games to look much better then on consoles, you have to upgrade your PC frequently. |
thats not true, unless you buy basic parts and i mean basic $50 graphics card $50 cpu then yes but most PC gamers spend on average $500 every 3 years just to keep their gaming PC in the sweet spot, there are still quite a lot of PC gamers using GTX 480 gpus and 1st gen i5's/i7's, its a common misconception that PC games have to frequently upgrade their computers.
|
Fuck that if I have to play Assassins Creed 3 on low or medium settings, there almost no difference to consoles then.
|
thats not my fault your not prepared to spend money buying realistic PC upgrades, if you think a $50 graphics card is ok for gaming you are living in a fantasy world, most people can build a gaming PC to play every pc game to date at medium to high settings for around $500-$700 which will last them at least 4 years before needing an upgrade.
my PC cost me £1000 only cause i wanted a high spec machine so i can play all PC games on high to ultra settings @ 1080p, after i factor in the amount of money ive spent on consoles since 2005 it works out to more than £1250 so my PC is actually cheaper than all the consoles that i bought yet is at least 10 times more powerful.
|
I have upgraded my PC last year. I made myself a Highend PC last year. And tell me can you run The Witcher 2 on the highest settings?
|
cant be that highend if you can only play assassins creed 3 on low to medium settings!
|
I wasn´t talking about myself. I was talking about PC gaming in general. And btw I have an Asus ROG Laptop as well.
