Jay520 on 29 November 2012
Jaywood said
Games that are recieved well do tend to sell more which is what Ive been stating since the beginning. You think this game will have legs and push 1m. yes that is plausible if that is what you want to hear? But i find it more plausible that it will do 700k-900k if it doesn't get bundled. If it gets bundled then it will for sure reach 1m. The only part you seem to disagree with is the 700k-900k part and since then you have been stating that Im wrong, so we will see. if Im wrong then i will be more than happy to admit it but you cant prove anything until that point and neither can I. But using a few games that sold over 1m when there is 100's that hasnt is not a good argument.
Thank you! You've just agreed to my point! I'm not seeing this game will sell over 1m. It may very well sell 700-900k. Like you said, its perfectly plausible either way. At this point, WE DON'T KNOW. That was my entire point. I'm not saying its definitely going to sell 1m. My point is its plausible, which you just agreed to. Therefore, you should not be jumping the gun by calling the game a flop. Again, you cannot call the game a flop because at this point, as I've illustrated above, there is no conclusive evidence that it will flop. There is no conclusive evidence that it will sell only 700-900k. I'm not saying it will or won't flop. YOU are calling it a flop. YOU are making the claim. My point was to show you that your claim is at the moment unsupported.
Games that are recieved well do tend to sell more which is what Ive been stating since the beginning. You think this game will have legs and push 1m. yes that is plausible if that is what you want to hear? But i find it more plausible that it will do 700k-900k if it doesn't get bundled. If it gets bundled then it will for sure reach 1m. The only part you seem to disagree with is the 700k-900k part and since then you have been stating that Im wrong, so we will see. if Im wrong then i will be more than happy to admit it but you cant prove anything until that point and neither can I. But using a few games that sold over 1m when there is 100's that hasnt is not a good argument.
Thank you! You've just agreed to my point! I'm not seeing this game will sell over 1m. It may very well sell 700-900k. Like you said, its perfectly plausible either way. At this point, WE DON'T KNOW. That was my entire point. I'm not saying its definitely going to sell 1m. My point is its plausible, which you just agreed to. Therefore, you should not be jumping the gun by calling the game a flop. Again, you cannot call the game a flop because at this point, as I've illustrated above, there is no conclusive evidence that it will flop. There is no conclusive evidence that it will sell only 700-900k. I'm not saying it will or won't flop. YOU are calling it a flop. YOU are making the claim. My point was to show you that your claim is at the moment unsupported.
