Zappykins said:
Persistantthug said:
Zappykins said:
I get so tired of the 'They haven't even tapped the power of the cell.' and 'games need bluray.' Even-though most muliplats run better on the Xbox, and only like 3-4 games, of all the games, need multiple DVD's to run this gen.
Any Sony fanboys and fangirls saying 'the PS2 was the most powerful of it's gen. That's why it sold the most.' (FYI, it was the least.) It's great that you love a system, but silly when one get's delusional and lies about it.
Power doesn't equal games. If you enjoy a game great. But the argument of which is more powerful between XBox 360 and PS3 is such a waste of time. The difference is like 5% which is completely negligible from a hardware standpoint. |
Actually,
That would be about 30 games, sir.
Also, for the record, the PS2 was not the least powerful Home console of the 6th generation....The DREAMCAST was.
|
You are right, I think of the Dreamcast as 5.5 Gen and not full 6th generation. As it was the predecessor of sorts for the Xbox. But if you included it in 6th it would be the least powerful.
Really? There are 30 games that need multiple DVD disk? I only know of a few, and most are fairly recent games: Assassin’s Creed 3, Halo 4, Final Fantasy, Mass Effect 2, Blue Dragon, Dead Space 2, and LA Noir. What else am I missing from the list?
Even Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim fits on one DVD and it's a huge game.
My point is while having a Blu-ray (wish they could have agreed on one format) would have been nice, it hasn’t been much of an issue for this generation.
|
Castlevania, RAGE, MGS Collection, MASS EFFECT 3, BATTLEFIELD 3, Star Ocean, Oblivion GOTY...and others.
Here's a decent list:
http://www.stripesonfire.com/xbox-360-game-install-list/
