pezus said:
http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/metro-2033 http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/planetside-2 http://www.metacritic.com/game/3ds/paper-mario-sticker-star - people say this one is good http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/dungeons-of-dredmor http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/assassins-creed-directors-cut-edition http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/eve-online http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/heavenly-sword http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/motorstorm-apocalypse
Most of these are from my own collection and they are all way above the average game. If you only play 90+ rated games then sure, 76 is below average, but in an objective manner...76 is way above average. Heck, even IGN, who give some of the highest scores around score games a 6.8 on average. Gamespot 6.7. Eurogamer 6.66 |
I see what you are saying but sadly I don't like any of those games except for metro 2033 for PC though which is an 81. There is rare occasions that I do like lower reviewed games but most of the time I don't. I do tend to buy top rated stuff more than anything. Even assassins creed 1. I love the series but I hated the 1st game. I will most likely buy Paper Mario but I havent been looking forward to it because the lack of partners. Motorstorm was always a decent game but it just never really moved forward in my opinion. I'll call Motorstorm Apocolypse average as i dont think it was bad in any way. Never played Dungeons of dredmor so I wont say anything about it.







