kowenicki said:
Jay520 said:
JayWood2010 said:
pezus said:
JayWood2010 said:
Yeah remember me saying this game was going to flop both score and and sells wise? Not so outrageous anymore huh? |
You predicted a score of 76-82, which...is not a flop
|
Considering the way people were hyping this game up all year long yes I see this as a flop on both sides. People were predicting this to be a multi-million seller, and honestly unless this game get's bundled itll be lucky to reach 1 million. Im not sure what the metacritic for it is atm, around a 78 which is not a big flop but for the expectations that people had it is a bit low. I'm not saying it is a bad game because I know people are enjoying it on here but I have stood behind my prediction since the beta.
|
As for scores, most people expected low 80s or even lower. Scores are a bit low, but not enough to say the scores have flopped. It's as much of a flop as Halo 4 is. |
I dont know why you are following this path of debate when you dont agree with the initial view, its pointless.
The fact is it got a review in the mid 76 and Halo 4 got 87. Relative score to previous iterations mean nothing. In the context of the current reviews climate Halo 4 is clearly quite a bit the better game from a critical perspective and in a different universe for a sales perspective.
Cut the ridiculous comparison, stop playing games and semantics with other peoples posts and say what you personally think about the sales and critical reception of the game.
|
Wasn't the expectation for Halo 4 a 93 and it got an 87? 6 points less,
All Stars expectations was an 82 and it got 76? 6 points less.
Obviously Halo 4 got a better score (durp) but they are arguing as to what is considered a flop in terms of the games meta expectation and final meta score.
