I don't believe in nothing.
You know, cause we're talking about nothing and how we don't use double negatives. Huh? Geddit?
...
Anyway, for the sake of being relevant, I'll say that I don't see why you assume that laws and facts don't exist in the state of nothing. What if the only thing that existed in the nothing period was the concept of these laws? I mean, I don't see why not since we assume laws to be eternal. Sure, you say that this means that there was something in this time and that destroys the premise, but it actually doesn't. The problem we're having is that it's difficult for a physical something to come out of a physical nothing. Unless you want to argue that physical objects can come out of mere ideas, which is actually a really awesome hypothesis (but doesn't exactly suit a scientific worldview), I don't think this idea has got you much farther.
“These are my principles; if you don’t like them, I have others.” – Groucho Marx
