Jay520 on 24 November 2012
| Soleron said: I favour the idea that 'nothing' is a sea of random spontaneous energy. Sometimes, given enough time, a universe forms. Sometimes a universe is destroyed. This is the simplest and most natural extension of what we already know about vacuum. The universe's laws and so on are actually unique to it and a property of its formation rather than universal truth. Your conception of 'nothing' as truly empty and uneventful is a human thing and at odds with quantum mechanics. |
I don't want to make any assertions on what 'nothing' is. just used the concept of 'nothing' that almost everyone thinks of when thinking of "before the universe."
