By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DarkThanatos said:
mantlepiecek said:

People have asked me for my reasons and I will provide them.

Reason No. 1 why I suspect DT - He has evaded a question of mine. There is actually proof of this.

Reason No. 2 - He has made weird theories that don't convince me of his sincerity. 3 + 3 scum theory, being suspicious of zero and saying that at least one of the four people who attacked zero are scum by virtue of statistics. Saying 3rd party can try and mislynch this early, using "I am not as much experienced" excuse. That is silly coming from someone like DT.

(It's funny that prof quoted exactly the posts that made me suspicious of him.)

I am less suspicious of tabaha compared to DT. I also feel hatmoza is town, and prof might be town because of the way he argued - though he is neutral overall.

There may have been other reasons that might have slipped my mind. This two however, are the dominant reasoning for my suspicion on DT.

I am against lynching Miz, zero, ABC. I am ok with lynching ninetailchris and haxton, even though I am usually against lynching new players these guys haven't really shown any sign of interest towards this game.

I also think happy is playing weird. Joking around, doing nothing of importance.

2) 3+3 theory is exactly that. A theory. We've had two scum teams in a smaller game then this. Why don't you like that idea Mantle? Second team perhaps? 

Possible slip here. Are you on the first team?



Signature goes here!