| fillet said:
1 + 1 = 2 But we're not living in a world consisting of 1s. We're living in real life, past gen means nothing. Now means everything, the power of the cell is now. What's to say that it will be the past 2 gens CPU power that will mean in future generations Sony fans won't mind? That's making some crazy assumptions. 1. That PS3 fans owned both a PS1 and PS2....AND that they knew the PS1 was more powerful, unlikely. 2. That PS3 fans are generally in their late 20s and most of them will buy the PS3 (children under the age of 10 don't know what a CPU is - generally). That sounds quite far fetched to me. The power of the cell is a modern day feeling and a recent one. I think that's a much stronger ideology than "They're used to it with PS1 and PS2"... Where's the analysis in that? |
My post answers the question. If the PS4 is not the strongest, then Sony fans of the PS4 era will act like Sony fans of the PS1/PS2 era. Whoever has the strongest console will be the ones bragging. Sony fans would naturally have to stop bragging about graphics ala PS1/PS2 era. Deep down inside, will they care? Maybe, but only mildly and temporarily. But if they are truly Sony fans, then they would eventually recognize that it's the best decision. Some may be extremely upset, but those would be graphic fans rather than Sony fans.
You seem to be suggesting that the mentality of PS2 fans did not transfer to the PS3, in terms of graphics. This tells me that thee mentality of Sony fans are adapted around the power of the console. If this is true, then the mentality of PS3 fans will not transfer to the PS4. Instead, Sony fans mentality will be adapted around the PS4. So if the PS4 is the weakest, then they will accept it.
As for the rest of your post, I honestly cannot understand a single sentence of what you typed.
