Kasz216 said: Yes REALLY. It's all revenge starting for this Where they claimed "political corruption."
"Town officials said during the trial they hadn’t read all of the accompanying documents and relied on the AAA rating to make the decision to invest in the notes." Essentially they sued because they were too stupid to read their paperwork. http://www.businessinsider.com/australian-court-ruling-on-sp-2012-11
It's 70-80% formula. Higher in the cases of bonds like the Australian case. |
the Australian court does not see it as revenge!
A breakthrough came three weeks ago when an Australian court ruled that S&P misled 12 councils in Australia by awarded a AAA rating to derivatives products created by ABN Amro which imploded less than two years after they were sold.
what your say is these credit rating agencys can police everyone else but not them selves?
come on now
I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.