selnor said:
SOLIDSNAKE08 said:
selnor said:
ethomaz said:
|
selnor said:
Really?
So you like to disregard DF when it suits your graphics agenda?
|
I edited my post... DF removed this part of article when it says the best visual ever on console ("on console" was direct related to X360 said in the same sentence).
Read the DF article again.
|
Technologically speaking, Halo 4 doesn't put a foot wrong throughout the entire eight to nine hour campaign. The enhancements to modelling, lighting and environments are beautiful and play host to some of the most epic gunplay we've experienced on a home console title.
In an era where the likes of Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have defined the graphical state-of-the-art with Uncharted and God of War, Xbox 360 finally has its own shot at the title - and it's a genuinely worthwhile, lavish and occasionally even breathtaking experience.
Read it again and its still plain as day.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-halo-4
|
halo 4 hasnt changed anything. its not even the best looking 360 game, never mind the best looking console game. gears of war 3 is still xbox 360s best looking game. either way, neither halo 4 or gears 3 look anywhere near as good as ps3's best looking exclusives which are quite old now. this thread is proof. look at the pictures.
|
OMFG. How many terrible fans are there on this site now?
The words in my previous post are not my own. They are from the tecnical analysis of alo 4 at DF. Its a fact that Halo 4 is by far the best technical achievement on 360. And is up there with fighting for number 1 in consoles. FACT. Not opinion.
Read the DF analysis.
Jesus Christ.
|
i dont give a fuck what DF says. to me, only my eyes matter and to me halo 4 isnt even best looking 360 game. ok, its the best looking halo game. happy?
