By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGKing said:
Mr Khan said:
VGKing said:
z101 said:
Turkish said:
Heavenly_King said:

You have to update the WiiU ram.   According to neogaf it is not even 17gb/s, it is.......12.8gb/s

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=44502005&postcount=1200


Damn, updating now. Thanks for notifying.

Because someone on the internet said it, it must be true ...

Surely you people should wait when real technical specs roll in, not just a lonely number.

And the headline is false at all, because the eDRAM is also RAM and much more and faster than on any console before.

Then we would be waiting forever. There's a reason Nintendo hasn't(and won't) reveal specs. The system is way too underpowered to be a next-gen system. This just wont' get good 3rd party support. The ports it already had are horrible.

Be very careful making statements like this.

Very, very careful.

It's not a statement, its an opinion. For a next-gen console, the Wii U isn't impressive at all to me.(power wise) 

What it really comes down to is Nintendo first party games and if you find that Gamepad appealing enough....

I agree with Kotaku's review of the Wii U. They said it's not worth buying yet if you have a PS3 or 360 already.(Which I do)

Of course stuff like Wii U getting accidentaly hacked on Day 1, huge Day 0 firmware update or the slow OS isn't helping to change my opinion.

"It's my opinion, man" isn't a valid rebuttal.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.