The argument in the OP is pretty weak. Not saying you arn't allowed to believe what you'd like, a persons religion is there own as everyone sees the world differently. But you make some very basic logical errors in your OP.
For instance, you somehow seem to equate being first with being correct. History has shown that if anything the latest information contains more truth than the theories that predate it.
You also suggest that two religions sharing ideas or themes makes the one that came later false which doesn't make any sense. If everytime someone came up with a theory they had to exclude the ideas of all other theories up to that point we would never move forward as a species. At the very least we would move very slowly.
I'm not going to get to much into the religious argument as people smarter and wiser than anyone on this website have been debating it for centuries to no avail. That, and I prefere to deal with logical reasoning.
You also seem to put things into this very black and white "good and evil" setting that doesn't really make sense. What's right and what's wrong, what's good and what's evil are all up to us. It's perspective and to declare any remark made about "good and evil" as truth is foolish.
Speaking of perspective. To give you an idea of where I'm coming from I consider myself an agnostic athiest. I believe that life is part of a chain of very specific (and lucky) chemical reactions, but I willingly accept that I will never know. I find this thought freeing. Without the structure of knowing we are given a blank canvas on which we can choose how we wish to look at life.
But, you claim to know. You don't know, you cannot know. You may even be right, but you do not know. There is an arrogance in your post and in your replies. You hold on to a religion that lies outside the norm so that you can look down on those that you consider "mainstream". Trying to be different doesn't make you better, it doesn't even really make you different. It makes you insecure.







