KungKras said:
They both quote and parrot their respective religious doctrines. These doctrines are also the single context that they approach the discussion in. The christians are gonna quote the bible and use it as authority, while the satanist guy is gonna repeat stuff he read on his satanist websites. They both derive and base their arguments from their sources of faith. The similarity is striking. |
Read what you just wrote.
The situation is saying the bible says x and the guy responded with the quotes saying it doesn't. Please tell how quoting a satan site is the same as quoting the actual source.
The quoting of the bible as authority is based on what actually is being said and isn't same as quoting a random satan website on why it's true in which is the source of the discussion.
What you did was just group them because you wanted to discredit them because both not based on the actual argument but a personal view on religious people. I seen this enough to know where it's coming from. If we were to change this to any other discussion and it's the same.
Plus the discussion of conspicaries further prove the idea that there nothing comparable besides them just arguing.
Now I have to say your bias is pretty obvious at this point and are you going decline that this infact is not your reasoning?
"Excuse me sir, I see you have a weapon. Why don't you put it down and let's settle this like gentlemen" ~ max
