| forevercloud3000 said: like I said earlier, it is presented as a cheeky statement. He doesn't truely think that, essentuated by the very hokey image next to it. In other words he was being facesious. |
And like I said earlier, there is nothing to suggest he is not being serious. When writing articles, you could put an exaggerated image in. It's an exaggerated representation of your argument meant to quickly and emphatically sum up your position. As far as I can tell he is being totally serious.
If he's not being serious, then I have to assume he's not serious about anything written in the article, as making a facetious joke that takes up nearly 1/2 of your article would be an incredibly strange design choice. This isn't a passing thing, it's HALF OF THE FREAKING ARTICLE. Are you trying to tell me that this is 1/2 a joke article and half serious? If you're telling me that, then you're also telling me that this guy is a shit writer and I shouldn't take anything he says seriously.
So take your pick. Either he's being serious and he's making up conspiracies where there are none, or he's not being serious and he's a terrible writer.
