Jay520 said:
I'm not going to risk Brotherhood. WHen I told my friends how much I hated the few minutes I plated AC1, they all told me, "Dude, AC2 is so much better, you gotta play it!" My friends and improved reviews all convinced me to try the game out. Unfortunately, when I played it, it was just as boring as AC1. I was fooled twice already; I won't be made a fool a third time. Flame thread? maybe...depends on your definition of a flame thread. I'm expressing my discontent of a game using what I think is well-supporting reasoning. If that's a flame thread, then so be it. |
I still dont get what you saying. You have a problem with killing the main target and then running away? The stealth part usually comes before you kill the main guy or as you are trying to kill him. Also some missions are simply not designed for stealth either so you cant expect stealth in certain situations. This is an action adventure game NOT a pure stealth game. The way you play is up to you. I have played most of AC2 and Brotherhood using stealh the game isnt satisfactory for me if i dont play it like this.
And i was not trying to convince you to play brotherhood. You should never play another AC game ever if you sucked at 2 or didnt like it.
And yeah i say this is a flame thread because all of your points are baseless. You also made the argument against the IP as a whole when you only played 1 out of the 5 games? And each game mixes up core gameplay elements by quite a bit. So you simply cant have the knowledge to make the statements you are making. Its like a guy plays Halo ODST then goes on to say the entire IP is overated. Total bullshit man and you should know this.







