"
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0514.htm
CLEARLY using the hebrew for bird. (Remember to read right to left)
So by your own admission, this is wrong, and hence not by devine inspiration.
Don't worry, I think we all expect no reply..."
You do know thiers many differnet hebrews? Thiers Classical hebrew which i guess the old/new testament where written on and the new hebrew which is used today.
When i was talking about the "bird" I was giving you an assumption of why they mention the bat as a bird. Heres another idea to it. What if back then anything that flew was considered a bird? What if back then they didn't classify animals by groups like we do today?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_Scrolls Thats one of the oldest surviving bible we have today.
We woun't be able to read the actual words written in the original bible(But we pretty much have every important thing we need to know aka christ is God) .
But now is it that important that our new bible mentions a bat as a bird? The important information is here you don't need to know anything else. Geez....
