MrBubbles said:
fordy said:
MrBubbles said:
they arent a state so it doesnt matter if someone or a group of people says they are. ( they do not have the function, form or capabilities of a state. they do not and cannot meet the criteria for a state without a resolution with israel. if they acted like adults then all the pressure would be on israel to concede to a reasonable settlement. when they behave like menaces then the focus will always be on their own improvement)
|
The same could be said about the United States. After all, look how they became a state.
"they arent a state so it doesnt matter if someone or a group of people says they are. ( they do not have the function, form or capabilities of a state. they do not and cannot meet the criteria for a state without a resolution with England. if they acted like adults then all the pressure would be on England to concede to a reasonable settlement. when they behave like menaces then the focus will always be on their own improvement)"
|
actually thats not at all comparable. honestly i cant even imagine how you might be percieving the situations as to grasp any comparison... :/
|
No, not comparable at all, because it conflicts with your logic, right?
What if America is denounced as a state and classified as "British territory under terrorist control"? After all, they didn't achieve independence from the English in a peaceful way, right? By your reasoning, they should have not fought back at all, and in turn that would have made the English somehow concede.
