Kasz216 said:
I also get the feeling that you don't quite get what Nate Silver does when using the term "correct data". Since everybody had the same data... and scrutinizing data sets is only ever a good thing, at least among researchers. If you'll note, practically all the current coverage is actually just that, analysing why things turned out why they did, confused why republicans didn't vote in higher numbers. |
You always have to comment on the semantics. Sorry! He had the correct study results, the correct model.
The way things turned out as they did because they weren't the majority. Not sure what else there is to add to that.