Why did Sony go with Super Smash Bros. too instead of Super Mario Bros. too?

[DanneSandin]

Chandler said:

bananaking21 said:

here is a review on SMB 2 on 3ds from metacritic 

"This game is short and the lack of innovation caused this review. No online mp in 2012 is brutal and unacceptable. Just bc it's Mario doesn't make it good, this is pandering and I'm not a fan anymore as an adult. I demand better in my games and this doesn't cut it. The raccoon suit only thing remotely positive in this game."

1/10

now you can say that some sites give "troll" reviews like this as well but then lets see who can find more "troll" reviews more, me bringing out metacritic user reviews, or you finding websites "troll" reviews. lets see who finds more, shall we?

 

You forgot to mention that this is a USER review LOL. Now we are citing trolls as facts. The sad thing is, I can't even cite a troll review for LBPV because nobody trolls vita games anymore, it wouldn't draw enough attention to be worth it. I could do one but what's the point. You know the old saying, I f a troll trolls a game that nobody cares about, did he really troll anybody? Or something along those lines L O L.

in all honesty, he brought that up because I pointed to gamrwise user scores of SMB being higher than lbp2. I did so trying to make a point that neither of user score or review score is to be trusted really