DanneSandin said:
bananaking21 said:
DanneSandin said:
bananaking21 said:
sensebringer said:
A review of a game is an Opinion. It is not a fact.
|
when did i ever say it wasnt? i stated that LBP had higher metacritic scores then SMB. is that an opinion or fact?
|
It's the fact of opinions
|
made my people who's profession is to objectivly review games based on there good and bad qualities, there for making there opinions much more trust worthy than internet fanboys. you know its why publishers even give rewards to developers based on metacritic reviews, you know because developers profession is to rate games, its their job. and until you give any real evidence that LBP scores were baised, adjusted and bought you have no legs to stand on to claim they were
|
Then you should provid evidence that those scores I offered were by fan boys. And even if it is by fan boys, those fan boys seem to like SMB3 better than LBP2...
|
here is a review on SMB 2 on 3ds from metacritic
"This game is short and the lack of innovation caused this review. No online mp in 2012 is brutal and unacceptable. Just bc it's Mario doesn't make it good, this is pandering and I'm not a fan anymore as an adult. I demand better in my games and this doesn't cut it. The raccoon suit only thing remotely positive in this game."
1/10
now you can say that some sites give "troll" reviews like this as well but then lets see who can find more "troll" reviews more, me bringing out metacritic user reviews, or you finding websites "troll" reviews. lets see who finds more, shall we?
