Kasz216 said:
the truth is, statistics don't like. It's just most people don't understand the statistics and don't really understand what's being said.
It would be really worth it to replace a lot of Alegebra and Geometry in jr highschools and highschool with math logic and statistics classes. Much more applicable day to day. |
Couldn't agree more. As long as you know what the stats represent, the stats can't lie. The problem is, the meaning can sometimes be misleading and counterintuitive.
One example that I've been reading up on lately and that's relevant to politics is what people mean when they identify as conservative or liberal. After the election, I remember Ari Fleischer talking about how the conservative ideology dominates liberal ideology, so the country is still a center-right country. The problem is, it seems people don't have politics in mind when they identify with conservatism. Conservatism actually loads more onto a religious/social/familial dimension while liberalism is associated moreso with the counterculture of the 1970s, race riots, environmentalism, welfare exploitation, etc. This is the reason you tend to see Democrats with a party ID advantage even though liberalism gets trounced 2:1 by conservatism. Long story short, there's a big difference between someone identifying as a republican and a conservative or vice versa.