Evidence for the existence of God

[Garcian Smith]

cleveland124 said:

Garcian Smith said:
So, to conclude: Take a few classes on logic and check your arguments to see if they've been debunked before (chances are they have) before you try to spout them off as conclusive. Philosophers have been trying to prove the existence of God for millenniums. The chances of you - or someone else with no background in logic - doing so on a message board is infinitesimally small.

Philosophers still have debates today about the existence of God. You brought up a few good points but none as conclusive as you believe. The chances of proving the non-existence of God is just as likely in this thread.

I dont need to "prove the non-existence of God." The burden of proof is on the claimant - that being you. As the defender of the status quo, all I need to do is show why your arguments are wrong. And I have. The errors in logic you made/have been making are things that any first-year philosophy major could see through.

Also: why aren't my points "as conclusive as I believe"? Please, explain to me where I'm wrong, and/or why my counterarguments don't invalidate yours.

At any rate, I'm busy with work right now, but if I have time later, maybe I'll do a write-up on the Trasnscendental Argument. I just glanced over the website that someone provided earlier in the thread, and I already see several glaring flaws to it.