By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

See, that's where I disagree with views like yours cleveland124.

Any belief without a God figure doesn't mean that spontaneous generation occurred. It could also mean that something or someone did create something in the past, but that being may be dead or is capable of dying. Just as Atheism is a leveling of the playing field. As an Atheist I don't rule out that there may be something in control of us indirectly, but I believe that that being or collection of beings is capable of death and it not infallible as religion would have you believe.

And a Godless person is NOT a person without morals. As individuals, we can live without other people, but we can live a better life with people. Morally, if you go around killing other people, you detriment your own life by taking away the collective social environment. This is why, I think, religious people are actually the egotists, assuming that a world without God is a world of chaos because people would not control themselves. Natural selection would weed out the societies that followed chaos and only those intelligent enough to understand that a collective group is stable and healthier would live on. You see this in the animal kingdom with packs, herds, and the like.



It seems the mods need help with this forum.  I have zero tolerance for trolling, platform criticism (Rule 4), and poster bad-mouthing (Rule 3.4) and you will be reported.

Review before posting: http://vgchartz.com/forum/rules.php