Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
Aldro said:
Nsanity said:
Apparently, Metacritic dont include all Tom Chick reviews. |
What do you mean?
I believe the site Quarter to whatever was added in like January 2012. So before then, they werent in the "system".
Their scores are really different from some sites. In a way... isnt that what most people bitch about? How we see 7 as bad yet it is a great score etc? Maybe more should be like that site (despite their low scores being given to arguably very high quality games imo xD)
EDIT: Also, its odd how Meta chooses what sites to add scores to. Like.. there are reviews that are specifically said to be about both PS3 and 360, yet Meta only adds it to ONE of these (usually 360) and leaves PS3 at lower. When looking at exclusives however, the PS3 has A LOT of more reviews (usually, just see Uncharted 2-3 and Heavy Rain. Now try finding any game with that many reviews). Who makes these decisions? lol Thats also why UC2s 105 reviews and keeping 96 is so insane. Like only 1 single score is in the 80s or something OUT OF 105 whereas 38-39 are perfect xD. UC3 is lucky it got 24 perfect scores and managed to outwin that 5/10 from AV.Club due to it.
|
Who the heck is in charge of Metacritic games section anyway? Anyone know?
|
I bet its Illuminati BELIEVE!
