Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
bananaking21 said:
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
bananaking21 said:
i know people are upset at the score and all, and from what i seen no way halo 4 is a 2 out of 10. but just because one person thinks so doesnt mean we have to ban the site from metacritic. honestly if we keep doing so reviews will mean nothing in the future because all we will get are high review scores for our favorite franchises no matter how bad or good the game really is |
No..its not all about the score BUT the content of their review.
Im tired at getting angry at EGM, Quarter to three and gamearena. Im just gonna go play halo.
|
well its just one review, it really doesnt matter much and thats the hole point of metacritic, to not depends on one review but all of them and give an idea of how reviews see the game in a general sense. now would i agree with the review? most probably not. but at the end it doesnt really matter, it wont affect the overall score very much
|
90 to 89 to 88 to 87.
As a Halo fan, this bothers me very much. Im sure you will be too with the game you love (whatever it is).
|
that one review didnt pull it down from 90 to 87, its the reviews its been getting recently. of course a halo fan like yourself would like a halo game to get really high reviews thats understandable, but from what it seems halo 4 reviewers seem to agree on the 87 score as it is the avarage out of 61 reviews so far, one review wont make a difference. we shouldnt go mad because a game didnt get the score we wanted it to get. if reviewrs stop criticizing games then whats the point? plus if the game gets a 1 meta score or 99, its gonna still be exactly the same game, and make no difference to you what so ever
