Halo 4 gets a 20/100 on Meta, proves eview system is broken.

[Cobretti2]

Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:

Cobretti2 said:

Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:

Cobretti2 said:
The guy did not give the game a 20/100

He gave it a 1 star:

Read his FAQ about his responses to Journey.
http://www.quartertothree.com/fp/2012/03/24/the-official-journey-review-faq/

1/5 = 2/10 = 20/100

Congratualitions you know basic math.

i said READ his FAQ:

 

Q: Why did you give Journey a 40%?

A: I didn’t. Quarter to Three uses a five star scale. One of the reasons I avoid percentage ratings is that too many people associate it with grade school, where anything below a 70% is a failing grade. Any scale where only the top third of the ratings is considered acceptable is a broken scale. Which is fine for children doing multiple choice questions about The Scarlet Letter, isosceles triangles, or the capital of France. But adults evaluating entertainment should be afforded the full range of any ratings scale.

 

No, I said 20/100 because this is how Meta translated his 1/5 star. 

well my bad.

The point I was making is BLAME meta to those who think he gave it 20/100

From what I read he seemed like he was just expecting more and things that he liked from the older games got taken out of this game. Doesn't mean that the game in itself sucks or is broken.

It is similar to say Nintendo games, where those who have played every mario kart will be like meh it is just mario kart with a few tweaks. New people who haven't played it may give it a better score.

Essentially what I am saying is he is using his benchmark, whatever it is in his head and saying this doesn't meet it, therefore I'll give it this.

I am sure if the scale was a 1 to 10, where in his words 7 is considered a pass, he probbaly would have given it a 6.