Well hard question. I voted for the entire human population.
Let me change the situation a little bit.
You remember dark knight? The scene with the 2 boats? Where noone bombed the other boat? Thats unlikely because humans are idiots.
So lets say there is news like: "bad people were hiding a nuke in our city they want us to kill person XY otherwhise they will bomb the city"
I would more likely kill everyone who wants to attack the innocent person( may it be a million people) than kill the 1 person.
Why? because:
1 innocent life = 1000000 innocent lifes.
BUT
1 innocent life > 9999999999999999999999999999 corrupted lifes
And because the rest of the city turned from innocent people to corrupted people (because they clearly want to kill 1 innocent person which makes them everything else than innocent) They gave up their status as innocent people and dont need to be treated as such.
if noone would go vigilante I would do nothing at all and leave the city.
But because something like this will never happen I dont own a gun and dont plan on owning a gun EVER You guys dont need to worry LOL and If I would kill 1 innocent person by accident I would have to kill myself because I failed my own logic and thats to risky ;)
