pezus said:
selnor said:
What? As far as I remember MGS 1 is classed as the pinnacle of that series. GTA 4 we have confirmation that reviews were paid for. And I dont remeber any gaming media saying RE 4 was better than 1 or 2. As for COD. MW 1 was reviewed well, but again I dont remeber the general consensus being it was better tan the WW2 critically acclaimed COD 2. Cod 2 still being my faveourite also.
Final Fantasy 4 wasnt particularly great in comparison to 2 or 3. 6 eclipses everyting though.
Scores aside, did 95% of reviewers say MGS4, COD 4, RE 4 was the best in the franchise?
With the Halo reviews they flat out are stating its the best Halo ever in actual words.
|
MGS4 was called the best MGS multiple times in reviews and that is what we're talking about. GTAIV the same. Confirmation that reviews were paid for...from whom? Resident Evil 4 was the best received RE by a lot and won multiple GOTY awards. MW was looked at as a true breakthrough. It revolutionized the whole FPS genre. CoD2 is a great game (and my personal favorite) but critics definitely preferred CoD4 in general.
Edit: Bold - No, but what about Halo 4? Nowhere near that percent. Well, CoD 4 is probably the closest to 95% saying that.
|
Pretty muc every Halo 4 review Ive read has said this. Except the douche guys review.
If critics did in fact say this about the other games I stand corrected. Also shocked though. Cause MGS4 was unplayable for me. Resi 4 killed that franchise and COD 4 well its better than MW2 onwards at least for me.
As for GTA4 we now have had 3 sources over the years come forward saying reviewers were paid.
