spurgeonryan said:
Yeah. So The Romster got one out of all the debates. That means he won? |
You could argue that the first debate "moved the needle" in a way that neither of the subsequent two did, and therefore that Romney "won" the debates.
But winning the debates, without a knock-out blow is more like winning rounds in a boxing match than anything else. Without the knockout, the fight is decided at a later time. That is the case with these debates: Romney threw a haymaker in the first round, Obama bounced back in Round 2 and threw his own in Round 3. Whether your prefered one over the other is meaningless in as much as neither knocked the other guy out.
My gut tells me this is going to be a close race Nov 6th.