I just think it implies that Halo needs to redefine more. Gamereactor that gave Halo 1-3 a 10/10 gave Halo 4 a 9 saying despite being great, it needs to innovate/surprise people and he felt 343 played it safe.
90 meta is great. Sure compared to like all of the 360 titles, its the lowest. It had too much hype i believe too since the year was a bit lackluster. People mightve expected more. I know I predicted like 93-96.
Anyhow this whole "its the best halo" or "a 90 now is 96 a few years back" is a bit too much. How about we wait until we played it? Best halo is very possible but ive never truly been a big fan like most here. As for critics being harsh: we had like 2 games get 96 last year! Anyway, i think it can hold 90-91. Damn shame if it drops to 89 lol. I know its "just a number" but still.
