By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
drkohler said:
JEMC said:

(Numbers taken from Anandtech)

   HD 7970  HD 7900M
Stream Processors 2048 1280
Texture Units 128 80
ROPs 32 32
Core Clock  925MHz  850MHz
Memory Clock  1.375GHz (5.5GHz effective)  4.8GHz
Memory Bus Width  384-bit  256-bit
Memory  3GB GDDR5  2GB GDDR5

As you see, the cards are not exactly the same.

Forget GPUs with 384 bit paths instantly, even 256 bit paths is unlikely. Count the numbers of board layer any stable PC graphics card has - way too expensive for a console. As I have explained before, a (simplified) AMD7770 (which has a 128 bit bus) is cheap and more than powerful enough for 1080p/60Hz.

I was only comparing the 2 top of the line GPUs from AMD. the desktop and mobility ones.

I agree that there is no need for 384-bit GPUs in consoles, mainly because I don't think they will use GDDR5 memory but DDR3, and with DDR3 being slower it wouldn't be worth it.

And yes, an HD 7770 in a console would be powerful enough to play at 1080p (not sure at 60fps as developers always try to put more on screen rather than making it run faster). But the rumor we started discussing talked about a GTX570, and the 7770 don't reach that performance.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.