Microsoft Kinect: Why it failed to do what it was supposed to do even though it was successful

[oniyide]

sales2099 said:

oniyide said:

sales2099 said:

oniyide said:

sales2099 said:

oniyide said:
@sales2099

"Anybody who believed MS PR about kinect being for the core need professional help and are extremely gullible. That is PR"

Man you are so full of crap its almost funny. YOU were the one saying that this or that game would shut reviewers up and that Kinect could do core games. Now you wanna backtrack?? LOL. Oh man, you do make some valid points though

Kinect having one or two core titles doesnt change that the mass majority are meant for casuals. Point stands.

Thats not what you were saying when it first came out, my point still stands. if you wanna sit here and act like you weren't buying into the whole "Kinect for core" hype, when it originally came out then thats on you. 

You can twist my words but my stance was always that kinect was for casuals first with core being a secondary objective

Proof is in the pudding, "Fable Journeys will shut the critics up" sound familar.  Why say that unless you felt that the Kinect could do a core game? Whether the casuals were the priority (which i agree with) is irrelevant.

I did feel Kinect could do a core game well. But that doesnt mean it was Kinects primary function. Color me hopeful that Kinect could do another core title outside The Gunstringer, no more. I know what Kinect was really made for.

See? Was that so hard to admit? Its ok to be wrong sometimes. Dont know why you keep saying that other stuff, since i never said anything about that and has nothing at all to do with my initial inquiry.