pezus said:
sales2099 said:
pezus said:
sales2099 said:
pezus said:
sales2099 said:
I think its funny how there are more reviews for the 360 version even though the PS3 one has exclusive content :)
Make way for Halo 4 now! All eyes are on you
|
Metacritic are biased. They add reviews to the 360 version when the review is also for the PS3 version. BTW, 88 vs. 84 :)
|
80-89 range = Same. No need to quibble on a few points when your in the same camp. Now if the PS3 version was 90+ then youd have something.
Also, (insert conspiracy picture here). :)
|
No, 85-95 is the same. So unfortunately ACIII on 360 is a level below the PS3 version.
It's the truth though, and that also explains the 4 point score difference. Just compare and contrast which reviews they picked for each one. ACII got more "360 reviews" added as well, and so did all the others iirc.
|
Whoa whoa. Your the first person to group high 80's games with 90+ games. That aint the consensus....90+ is its own category and cant be infiltrated by 80's scores. 85-95 isnt the same because the key difference is the "8" and "9" as the first digit, automatically seperating each from the other. The second digit is mere "details".
|
No, over 95 is GOTY material so that should be its own group. Then we go 10 down from there.
|
Any 90+ game can be nominated for GOTY. Your the first person to say such a thing. I mean to group 85-89 games with low 90 games is just wrong and confusing. Its a good thing only you seem to share this stance.
Its simpler and more practical to group things by the 10's. I mean to use a 95 game to make a 91 game suck by comparison is equally weird.....they both earned the badge of 90+ and deserve equal praise.
Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles.
